<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MoneyBlogNewz &#124; Financial Education &#38; Gossip &#187; opt in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/tag/opt-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog</link>
	<description>Hot Topic News &#38; Financial Education Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Citi to give customers a break by clearing smallest checks first</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/04/04/citi-clearing-smallest-checks-first/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/04/04/citi-clearing-smallest-checks-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checking account overdraft charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debit overdraft protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ill gotten gains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opt in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft protection charges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=105269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rare case of voluntary consumer protection in the financial industry, Citi announced that it will change the way it clears checks in order to minimize overdraft protection charges. Financial reform restricts banks from providing overdraft protection for debit cards unless customers opt in, but the rules don&#8217;t apply to checking accounts. On Monday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thetruthabout/2779703958/sizes/m/in/photostream/" rel="external nofollow"><img title="overdraft protection" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3210/2779703958_18d6bdff92.jpg" alt="overdraft loan programs" width="300" height="224" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Citi will voluntarily end a practice that enables banks to charge customers repeatedly for overdraft protection. Image: CC TheTruthAbout/Flickr  </p></div>
<p>In a rare case of voluntary consumer protection in the financial industry, Citi announced that it will change the way it clears checks in order to minimize overdraft protection charges. Financial reform restricts banks from providing overdraft protection for debit cards unless customers opt in, but the rules don&#8217;t apply to checking accounts. On Monday Citi said it will curtail the practice of milking overdraft fees from checking accounts by processing smaller checks first.</p>
<h2>How banks milk checking account overdraft fees</h2>
<p>Citi will start processing checks written for smaller amounts first as of July 25. Before it announced the change, Citi, like most major banks, processed larger checks first in order to increase the likelihood of multiple overdraft charges on checking accounts. <a title="PMSMoneyblog" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/04/04/center-for-responsible-lending/">Consumer advocates</a> have long denounced the practice, but the banks commonly spin their deceit as a benefit to customers. According to banks, processing larger checks first ensures that high priority bills such as mortgages are paid on time. In reality, the practice works in reverse. For example, if a bank customer has a $100 checking balance and writes checks for $90, $25 and $15, the bank will clear the $90 check first. This leaves a $10 balance, which enables the bank to charge overdraft fees as high as $39 for both the $25 and $15 checks &#8212; an extra $78 in ill-gotten gains. As of July 25, Citi will clear the $25 and $15 checks first and only be able to gouge the customer once, instead of twice.</p>
<h3>Few consumers are opting in</h3>
<p>New financial reform laws passed in 2010 require banks to get permission from customers before enrolling them in debit overdraft loan programs. But according to Consumer Reports, banks have adopted misleading “opt-in” marketing strategies promoting expensive overdraft loans while failing to mention lower-cost alternatives that are available. Citi and Bank of America decided to eliminate debit overdraft protection altogether. Now they decline uncovered transactions at no cost, allow customers to link their checking account to savings, or offer an overdraft line of credit. A Consumer Reports poll found that only 22 percent of debit card holders have opted into overdraft loan programs. The poll also found that 70 percent of consumers would also like to have a choice about overdraft protection for checking accounts. Thirty eight percent of respondents said they would opt out if allowed to do so.</p>
<h3>Expect creative customer gouging to continue</h3>
<p>In 2009, banks penalized customers with overdraft protection on debit cards to the tune of about $20 billion. Banks collected another $12 billion from overdraft fees on checking accounts. Bank lobbyists managed to get voluntary overdraft loan programs for checking accounts exempted from financial reform, but the FDIC is considering an opt-in requirement at smaller state chartered banks for overdraft coverage on paper checks and electronic payments. Consumers Union, the non-profit publisher of Consumer Reports, is urging the FDIC to require all banks to get consent before before charging customers for checking account coverage. If the FDIC goes along, consumers can expect banks, including Citi and Bank of America, to create other charges such as increasing monthly checking account fees.  When regulators respond, banks will find other ways to make money for nothing.</p>
<p><strong>Sources</strong></p>
<p><a title="Associated Press" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Citi-to-start-clearing-apf-1510892963.html?x=0&amp;sec=topStories&amp;pos=main&amp;asset=&amp;ccode=">Associated Press</a></p>
<p><a title="Consumer Reports" href="http://pressroom.consumerreports.org/pressroom/2010/11/consumer-reports-poll-only-22-percent-of-bank-customers-have-opted-in-for-debit-card-overdraft-protection.html" rel="external nofollow">Consumer Reports</a></p>
<p><a title="New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/your-money/credit-and-debit-cards/10overdraft.html?_r=1" rel="external nofollow">New York Times</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Latitude for iPhone finally approved by Apple App Store</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/14/google-latitude-for-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/14/google-latitude-for-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple ios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background updating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foursquare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google latitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google latitude for android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google latitude for iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location sharing app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opt in]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=96742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Latitude, a mobile location-sharing app, has been approved by Apple for the iPhone. Google has been promising a version of Latitude for iPhone since it became available for Android nearly two years ago. Google claimed there were 9 million users of the app when it announced Google Latitude for iPhone, a number that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/29881930@N00/2085856619/" rel="external nofollow"><img title="google latitude" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2382/2085856619_2fc5162c5b.jpg" alt="location sharing app" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Google Latitude location sharing app, re-engineered for iOS 4, has been approved by the Apple App Store. Image: CC gailjadehamilton/Flickr </p></div>
<p>Google Latitude, a mobile location-sharing app, has been approved by Apple for the iPhone. Google has been promising a version of Latitude for iPhone since it became available for Android nearly two years ago. Google claimed there were 9 million users of the app when it announced Google Latitude for iPhone, a number that is being disputed.</p>
<h2>Google&#8217;s Latitude location-sharing app</h2>
<p>Google Latitude lets your friends and family track your every move when you&#8217;re carrying your smartphone. The free app lets users share their location at any particular moment on <a title="PMS Moneyblog" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/03/11/google-maps-bicyclists/">Google Maps</a>. Fellow Google Latitude users can know who&#8217;s close enough to meet quickly without calling them to ask. Google says Google Latitude is 100 percent opt-in. Users can turn off Latitude&#8217;s background updating to conceal their location when they&#8217;re not using their smartphones. Privacy settings allow sharing at a city-only level if the exact address is a little too intimate. Signing out puts you under the radar.</p>
<h3>Apple changes attitude on Latitude</h3>
<p>Google Latitude has been available for Android since February 2009. At the time, the Apple iOS didn&#8217;t support the multitasking required to support background updating. The Apple App Store rejected an earlier Google Latitude app with the reasoning that it could substitute for the iPhone&#8217;s native Maps application. The just-approved Google Latitude for iPhone was re-engineered for iOS 4, which includes multitasking. To use the app requires iOS 4 or newer on an iPhone 3GS or iPhone 4.</p>
<h3>Has Google Latitude upstaged Foursquare?</h3>
<p>When Google announced Google Latitude for the iPhone it claimed that 9 million people were active users of the app. That&#8217;s about twice as many users as the popular location-sharing app Foursquare. TechCrunch speculates that Google can claim 9 million active users because Latitude is built into the Maps app running on every Android phone. The Latitude users Google boasts may not be aware that they are using Latitude. It could be running in the background without the users knowing it&#8217;s giving away their every move.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a title="PC World" href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374245,00.asp" rel="external nofollow">PC World</a></p>
<p><a title="TechCrunch" href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/14/google-latitude/" rel="external nofollow">TechCrunch</a></p>
<p><a title="Apple Insider" href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/12/13/22_months_after_announcement_google_latitude_app_comes_to_apples_iphone.html" rel="external nofollow">Apple Insider</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

