<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MoneyBlogNewz &#124; Financial Education &#38; Gossip &#187; loan company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/tag/loan-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog</link>
	<description>Hot Topic News &#38; Financial Education Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:13:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Americans losing faith in mortgage loans and real estate</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/28/losing-faith-mortgages/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/28/losing-faith-mortgages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get a loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national housing quarterly survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new home sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=103031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans are becoming less convinced that getting mortgage loans to buy real estate is a good idea. A recent survey found that the number of people who believe owning a home is a worthy investment has dwindled to the lowest level in years. Home sales have been sluggish to recover from the housing crash. Fewer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FloodedHouseForSaleWithWagon.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="House" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/_5rmDOm3x5Mk/TWwDT_WZ07I/AAAAAAAAAEk/gQzru3v3Sls/s288/House%20for%20Sale.jpg" alt="House" width="288" height="191" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fewer Americans believe homeownership and real estate are worthy <a title="investments" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">investments</a>. Photo Credit: Infrogmation/Wikimedia Commons/CC-BY</p></div>
<p>Americans are becoming less convinced that getting mortgage loans to buy real estate is a good idea. A recent survey found that the number of people who believe owning a home is a worthy investment has dwindled to the lowest level in years. Home sales have been sluggish to recover from the housing crash.</p>
<h2>Fewer see homeownership as good investment</h2>
<p>American real estate has been shaken to its core during the past few years. One of the side effects has been that fewer people believe homeownership is something to aspire to and that owning a home is not as good an investment as once thought, according to <strong>Reuters</strong>. Mortgage investment house Fannie Mae performs a quarterly survey on attitudes about home ownership, called the National Housing Quarterly Survey, which found that 64 percent of respondents believed that the tradition of going to a bank or loan company to get a loan and buy a house was a good investment. That marked a declined from early 2010, when 70 percent of respondents thought so. In 2003, the figure was 83 percent.</p>
<h3>More people turning to rentals</h3>
<p>As fewer are buying houses, more are going with paying landlords instant cash through renting. The percentage of vacant rental units declined over the fourth quarter of 2010 to 9.4 percent from 10.3 percent in the summer of 2010. That is the lowest percentage of available rental units since 2007. The same survey from Fannie Mae found that nearly 75 percent of respondents said they thought it would be harder to get a mortgage from a loan lender than to  rent.</p>
<h3>Home sales fall</h3>
<p>New home sales plunged over the month of January 2011, according to <strong>CNN</strong>. Some areas where prices are dropping are able to sell more inventory, but areas like Arizona and other places with highly inflated prices have difficulty liquidating housing inventory. However, after stops and starts over the fall, new home sales fell 11.2 percent over January 2011, marking an 18.2 percent reduction between January 2010 and January 2011. The housing market is down more than 80 percent overall from a peak point in 2005.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/28/us-usa-housing-survey-idUSTRE71R3Q320110228?pageNumber=1" rel="external nofollow">Reuters</a></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/24/real_estate/january_new_home_sales/index.htm" rel="external nofollow">CNN</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing prices decline, but home sales are rising</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/23/housing-prices-home-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/23/housing-prices-home-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[median home value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=102740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nationwide home prices are declining, but home sales are beginning to rise. The past year has been volatile for real estate, but more people have been consulting with loan lenders to purchase a home. The low prices are thought to be the reason for the spike in purchases. Wealthy and investors buying houses again Figures [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fsbo_tablet.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="For Sale" src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TGm5Dnp6SiI/AAAAAAAAA0s/lLJMVFKbCR0/s288/For%20Sale.jpg" alt="For Sale" width="288" height="209" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Home sales have been increasing, but home values are declining. Image from Wikimedia Commons. </p></div>
<p>Nationwide home prices are declining, but home sales are beginning to rise. The past year has been volatile for real estate, but more people have been consulting with loan lenders to purchase a home. The low prices are thought to be the reason for the spike in purchases.</p>
<h2>Wealthy and investors buying houses again</h2>
<p>Figures for nationwide home sales from the National Association of Realtors indicate that an increasing number of people are purchasing homes, according to <strong>CNN</strong>. Home sales rose 2.7 percent over January 2011, to a seasonally adjusted rate of 5.36 million per year. The increase is also a 5.3 percent improvement over January 2010, marking the first time in seven months that home sales have been higher than figures from a year ago. However, the increase may be bolstered by people who don&#8217;t need to go to loan lenders to finance a home purchase. The number of cash purchases was 32 percent of all sales, up from 26 percent in January 2010. Sales to investors made up 23 percent of sales, which accounted for 17 percent of home sales in January 2010.</p>
<h3>Foreclosures may have made up difference</h3>
<p>The increased number of cash and investor purchases likely is due to deep discounts available on <a title="foreclosed" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">foreclosed</a> properties. Distressed properties, according to <strong>Bloomberg</strong>, accounted for 37 percent of January 2011 home sales. More homes are available at rock bottom prices, and many a loan company is anxious to get a home off its balance sheet. There aren&#8217;t many people who have enough instant cash to pay for a home out of pocket, even one sold at half its value. The median home price has declined 3 percent since January 2010, to $158,800.</p>
<h3>Home prices dropping</h3>
<p>Many major metropolitan areas are still experiencing declining home values, according to <strong>USA Today</strong>. The Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s Case Shiller Index recorded drops in all but one of the 20 major cities it tracks. Only Washington D.C. did not see home prices decline. Areas with inflated real estate values such as Arizona, California and Florida have experienced the worst in decline, but southern states like Mississippi and Alabama are also experiencing price declines. The rise in sales may signal reversing demand, and many economists believe 2011 will be a year of dramatic recovery.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/23/real_estate/january_home_sales/index.htm" rel="external nofollow">CNN</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-23/sales-of-u-s-existing-homes-climb-to-eight-month-high.html" rel="external nofollow">Bloomberg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2011-02-22-home-prices_N.htm" rel="external nofollow">USA Today</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank profits tumble as new laws for credit cards start working</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/22/new-laws-credit-cards/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/22/new-laws-credit-cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advance cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card accountabilty reponsibility and disclosure act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=102460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New regulations for credit cards on how interest rates and fees can be assessed are working. However, some loan lenders are lamenting the new rules that require greater disclosure when changing terms with customers. Outlawing guerrilla-style fee and interest raises has led Bank of America and other companies to lose value from credit card units. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/moneyblognewz/5280927416/" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Bank of America" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TWP0LWnIuiI/AAAAAAAADy4/vN6I7BdXpzM/s288/Bank%20of%20America.jpg" alt="Bank of America" width="288" height="235" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Credit card issuers, such as Bank of America, have been affected by new laws regarding credit cards. Image: MoneyBlogNewz/Flickr.com/CC-BY</p></div>
<p>New regulations for credit cards on how interest rates and fees can be assessed are working. However, some loan lenders are lamenting the new rules that require greater disclosure when changing terms with customers. Outlawing guerrilla-style fee and interest raises has led Bank of America and other companies to lose value from credit card units.</p>
<h2>Bank of America realizes loss from credit card unit</h2>
<p>The largest loan lender in the nation, Bank of America, recently announced that it would be adjusting previously filed financial statements regarding the banks&#8217; credit card unit, according to <strong>Bloomberg</strong>. B of A announced that it was adjusting a write down of FIA Card services, its credit card unit, for late 2009 from $10.4 billion to $20.3 billion, meaning the credit card unit is worth $20.3 billion less thank it was in 2008. In other words, the company adjusted previous filings to reflect a greater loss of value than previously thought. The write down is not a true cash loss, but an adjustment of the &#8220;goodwill&#8221;  value, or the value of an asset above market  value, due to the prestige of the holder of the asset. The bank cited regulatory conditions and &#8220;deteriorating credit quality&#8221; for FIA Card Services being worth $10 billion less than estimated in 2009.</p>
<h3>CARD Act cited for losses</h3>
<p>Some credit card loan lenders, such as Bank of America, are claiming that they are being hampered by new regulations, specifically the CARD Act, or Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act. It is posited that the act means less access to advance cash for further lending, though this means that the law is working. Since the CARD Act was enacted, fewer people have been hit with late fees and stung with sudden interest rate raises, according to <strong>CNN</strong>.</p>
<h3>New card law a smashing success</h3>
<p>The CARD Act has yielded some great results. Since the law was passed, studies show that about 2 percent of card holders had interest rates raised, compared to 15 percent before the CARD Act was passed. Late fees, which <a title="accounted" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">accounted</a> for $901 million in instant cash for card issuers in January 2010 &#8212; before the Act took effect in February 2010 &#8212; had dropped to $427 million by November 2010. That means companies from Scottsdale to Birmingham and all over the U.S. that look to seemingly surreptitious practices for revenue are having a harder time, which is what the CARD Act is supposed to do.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-21/bofa-almost-doubles-credit-card-unit-writedown-to-20-3-billion.html" rel="external nofollow">Bloomberg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/22/news/economy/credit_card_act/?cnn=yes">CNN<br />
</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mortgage delinquencies decline, but foreclosures rise</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/17/mortgage-delinquencies-foreclosures/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/17/mortgage-delinquencies-foreclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage bankers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage delinquencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo signing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=102199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of mortgage delinquencies has declined, but the number of foreclosures has risen. Though loan lenders can rejoice over more borrowers making payments, the inventory of foreclosed properties is at a record high. However, this may be a sign that foreclosures will slow in the future. Foreclosure inventory nears all time high The number [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foreclosedhome.JPG" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Foreclosed home" src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TP_044HbcPI/AAAAAAAADBo/UzgdKgZ7B7o/s288/Foreclosed.jpg" alt="Foreclosed home" width="288" height="216" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"><a title="Foreclosures" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">Foreclosures</a> rose during the past few months, but the number of mortgage delinquencies declined. Image: Brendel/Wikimedia Commons/CC-BY</p></div>
<p>The number of mortgage delinquencies has declined, but the number of foreclosures has risen. Though loan lenders can rejoice over more borrowers making payments, the inventory of foreclosed properties is at a record high. However, this may be a sign that foreclosures will slow in the future.</p>
<h2>Foreclosure inventory nears all time high</h2>
<p>The number of foreclosed properties loan lenders retain has hit an all time high, according to <strong>Bloomberg</strong>. A report was recently released by the Mortgage Bankers Association detailing the economic trends in real estate, and the number of foreclosed homes had risen to 4.63 percent of all mortgages at the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, which ended Sept. 30, 2010. The number of foreclosed properties is nearly the highest on record.  That figure had risen from 4.36 percent at the end of the third quarter of 2010. At that time, nearly 14 percent of all mortgage loans, or one in seven, were in foreclosure or homeowners were behind on payments to their loan company.</p>
<h3>Delinquencies decline</h3>
<p>Though the number of foreclosed properties has risen, the number of delinquencies has fallen. From July to December, 2010, the number of bank loans that were one payment behind dropped from 9.13 percent to 8.22 percent, according to <strong>CNN</strong>. Mortgage delinquencies have therefore dropped to the December 2007 rate, which marked the beginning of the recession. Seriously delinquent loans, or mortgage payments at least 90 days past due, declined from 5.02 percent in March of 2010 to 3.63 percent in December, 2010. This means more people are getting payday cash, and able to make payments.</p>
<h3>Foreclosures stalled for now</h3>
<p>The controversy over improper foreclosure procedures, or the &#8220;robo signing&#8221; affair, has led to a temporary slowing of foreclosures, but that may reverse itself as those issues are resolved. Florida is still the state most affected by foreclosure, with more than 14 percent of all homes in foreclosure. Mississippi had the highest delinquency rate, with 13.3 percent of homes behind at least one payment.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-17/u-s-loans-in-foreclosure-tie-record-as-lenders-delay-seizures.html" rel="external nofollow">Bloomberg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/17/real_estate/delinquency_rate_falls/" rel="external nofollow">CNN</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The adjustable rate mortgage is staging a comeback</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/14/adjustable-rate-mortgage/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/14/adjustable-rate-mortgage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 year fixed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustable rate morgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flipping houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=101939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the supposed causes of the real estate collapse and recession of the last few years was something called an adjustable rate mortgage. An adjustable rate mortgage, or ARM, can be misunderstood and, in fact, has a lot of benefits for some buyers. The ARM is starting to make a comeback. Adjustable Rate Mortgages [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/102425547566362864691/GhostTown02#5573678761459806546"><img title="Ghost town" src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TVmvTYzzcVI/AAAAAAAADu4/ydKw60aqk2w/s288/Ghost%20town.jpg" alt="Ghost town" width="288" height="216" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The adjustable rate mortgage was blamed in part for the recession, but it is starting to make a comeback. Image from Wikimedia Commons. </p></div>
<p>One of the supposed causes of the real estate collapse and recession of the last few years was something called an adjustable rate mortgage. An adjustable rate mortgage, or ARM, can be misunderstood and, in fact, has a lot of benefits for some buyers. The ARM is starting to make a comeback.</p>
<h2>Adjustable Rate Mortgages vilified</h2>
<p>During the real estate crash and recession, one of the <a title="financial" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">financial</a> instruments that was blamed was the adjustable rate mortgage. Unscrupulous loan lenders would offer mortgages with a low introductory rate. The interest rate would be drastically raised, pulling the rug from under the homeowner. However, when handled by the right bank and in the right situation, the adjustable rate mortgage, or ARM, is not inherently evil. For some people, it is the perfect loan, according to <strong>CNN</strong>. That is largely why sales of ARMs have risen to 5 percent of all mortgages in 2010, up from 3 percent in 2009. It is predicted that 10 percent of all mortgages lent during 2011 will be ARM loans.</p>
<h3>Perfect for some homeowners</h3>
<p>The flagship of all mortgages is the 30-year fixed rate mortgage, in which the rate never changes. An ARM has a lower introductory, averaging currently about 3.5 percent. The increments at which an ARM can be raised are limited by law, and so is the final interest rate. If a person plans to live in the home for five years or fewer, it makes more sense to get an ARM, as payments will be less and payments over the minimum can net greater equity. So if a person is planning to transfer from Jackson, Mississippi, to Birmingham, Alabama only a few years from when they purchase the home, it may be better to go with an ARM.</p>
<h3>Flipping houses</h3>
<p>The ARM is also great for homeowners attempting to flip homes and sell them for profit. By selecting an ARM, the homeowner has more instant cash that can be put into the remodeling budget. The trade of flipping houses could also make a comeback, according to <strong>Reuters</strong>, as the Federal Housing Association is extending a program providing government backed mortgage insurance on homes that are resold within 90 days of a previous sale.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/14/real_estate/adjustable_rate_mortgages_rise/index.htm" rel="external nofollow">CNN</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/28/usa-housing-idINN2818657720110128" rel="external nofollow">Reuters</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falling home values put record number of mortgages under water</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/10/home-values-underwater/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/02/10/home-values-underwater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installment loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo signing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwater mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=101577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is estimated that a record number of people are now under water on their mortgages because of falling home values. The value of houses nationwide has been steadily sliding downward as foreclosures, unemployment and tight credit take a toll on real estate. Values could continue to fall. Nearly a third of all mortgages could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 243px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FEMA_-_34476_-_Missouri_residents_wait_for_rescue_at_a_flooded_house.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Underwater house" src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TVQqqQeOkvI/AAAAAAAADsQ/GpgBE47jm7c/s288/Underwater%20House.jpg" alt="Underwater house" width="233" height="288" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Up to 27 percent of homeowners could be under water on their mortgages. Image from Wikimedia Commons.</p></div>
<p>It is estimated that a record number of people are now under water on their mortgages because of falling home values. The value of houses nationwide has been steadily sliding downward as foreclosures, unemployment and tight credit take a toll on real estate. Values could continue to fall.</p>
<h2>Nearly a third of all mortgages could be under water</h2>
<p>Home prices have been falling for the past few years during the recession. Because of continuing foreclosures, high unemployment and fewer homes being sold, the value of houses has continued to trend downward. It is estimated that 27 percent of American homeowners could be under water on their mortgages, meaning payments to the loan company cost more than the home is worth, according to <strong>Bloomberg</strong>. Real estate information company Zillow released a report stating that more than 15 million home loans were under water. Home prices are estimated to have fallen by almost 6 percent in the last year and almost 3 percent since September, 2010. Values are expected to decline 5 percent more in 2011.</p>
<h3>Deceptive decline in foreclosures</h3>
<p>Foreclosure activity has been closely watched over the past year in the hopes that a slowing rate of foreclosure would mean a real estate market close to recovering. A decrease in foreclosures occurred in January, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that the crisis is over, according to <strong>CNN</strong>. Because of the &#8220;robo-signing&#8221; scandal, where foreclosures were initiated by banks without reviewing the paperwork, the foreclosure process has been held up. The number of homes and <a title="installment loans" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">installment loans</a> foreclosed on will likely increase once the backlog of foreclosure cases in courts and at loan lenders is reduced.</p>
<h3>Areas with inflated value still reeling</h3>
<p>Areas where real estate values are the highest are still plagued by high foreclosure and rates of negative equity. Nevada, Arizona and California still lead the nation in foreclosure-affected states. Florida, though, has started to improve, falling to ninth place nationally in foreclosure rates.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-09/home-price-decline-leaves-27-of-u-s-owners-underwater-on-loans.html" rel="external nofollow">Bloomberg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/10/real_estate/foreclosure_filings_fall/" rel="external nofollow">CNN</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bailout official labels mortgage modification program a failure</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/01/27/mortgage-modification-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/01/27/mortgage-modification-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make home affordable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage modification program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neil barofsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtytrac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=100226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Inspector General of government bailout programs has labeled the mortgage modification program a failure. Neal Barofsky, appointed to oversee the bailout programs including the Home Affordable Modification Program, blasted the program in a Congressional hearing for being ineffective. More than half a million applicants have gotten their mortgages modified. Mortgage modification program blasted in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FEMA_-_41368_-_FEMA_Adiministrator_W._Craig_Fugate_at_a_House_Committee_hearing.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Congressional Hearing" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TUHQoHyEqKI/AAAAAAAADjo/zpq-UCguTjc/s288/Congressional%20hearing.jpg" alt="Congressional Hearing" width="288" height="192" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">At a recent congressional hearing, the government mortgage modification program was blasted as being a &quot;failure.&quot; Image from Wikimedia Commons.</p></div>
<p>The Inspector General of government bailout programs has labeled the mortgage modification program a failure. Neal Barofsky, appointed to oversee the bailout programs including the Home Affordable Modification Program, blasted the program in a Congressional hearing for being ineffective. More than half a million applicants have gotten their mortgages modified.</p>
<h2>Mortgage modification program blasted in hearing</h2>
<p>Recently, there was a joint Congressional hearing about whether certain programs in government bailouts had been effective, including the mortgage modification program. The program, which was nicknamed Make Home Affordable, but titled the Home Affordable Modification Program or HAMP, was blasted in the hearing as &#8220;a failure,&#8221; according to <strong>USA Today</strong>. Neil Barofsky was appointed as a special Inspector General in charge of bailout programs and funding and told the Congressional oversight committee that the mortgage modification program was not working. He went on to say that an increasing number of people will continue to want the program canceled, &#8220;and understandably so.&#8221; However, some have pointed to slow moving loan lenders as being part of the cause of the program&#8217;s problems.</p>
<h3>Call to repeal HAMP</h3>
<p>An increasing number of people are calling for the HAMP program to be cut. On the same day that the oversight committee met, three House Republicans submitted a bill that would end the  HAMP program. Doing so would cut $30 billion from unused funding for bailout emergency loans. HAMP was intended to help 3 million to 4 million people avoid foreclosure by modifying existing loans with loan companies, but only 549,620 mortgages have been successfully modified. However, the <a title="cash advances" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">cash advances</a> lent to banks, more than $341 billion, have been viewed as very successful.</p>
<h3>Foreclosures still epidemic</h3>
<p>The rate of foreclosure has started to fall in the worst hit areas, especially states like Arizona with higher than normal real estate values, according to <strong>CNN</strong>. Las Vegas, the worst hit city in the United States, has seen the rate of foreclosure fall by 7 percent over the last year, but one in nine homes there has been in some form of foreclosure activity. However, in a survey of more than 200 metro areas by RealtyTrac, the overall foreclosure rate rose by 72 percent in 2010.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2011-01-27-fed27_ST_N.htm" rel="external nofollow">USA Today</a></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/27/real_estate/metro_area_foreclosures/index.htm" rel="external nofollow">CNN</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More people are getting bank loans and buying houses</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/22/bank-loans-buying-houses/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/22/bank-loans-buying-houses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existing home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get a loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage loan modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[november home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=97608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of people getting bank loans for houses is increasing. Existing home sales crept up over November for the third increase in four months. However, sales are far below the levels that were seen last year. More homes being sold and bank loans taken out for purchases The housing market is still struggling to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:5_Wattle_Grove_land_for_sale_cell_9.JPG" rel="external nofollow"><img title="For Sale" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TRJ6ImhLwBI/AAAAAAAADOQ/EBcADl_cYas/s288/For%20Sale.JPG" alt="For Sale" width="288" height="216" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">More people got bank loans and bought houses in November, but sales are still sluggish overall. Image from Wikimedia Commons. </p></div>
<p>The number of people getting bank loans for houses is increasing. Existing home sales crept up over November for the third increase in four months. However, sales are far below the levels that were seen last year.</p>
<h2>More homes being sold and bank loans taken out for purchases</h2>
<p>The housing market is still struggling to recover, but there are glimmers of hope in that the number of people taking out bank loans or going to a loan company to purchase a home is increasing, according to USA Today. The seasonally adjusted rate of existing home sales increased to a rate of 4.68 million units per year. The increase for November home sales was the third increase in the rate of home sales in four months. Western states had the largest increase, as sales in the West increased by 11.7 percent, though areas like Nevada and Arizona are still struggling. The Midwest had a boost of 6.4 percent. The Northeast and the South had the smallest increases, rising by only 2.7 and 2.9 percent, respectively.</p>
<h3>The bad news</h3>
<p>Despite an increase in home sales and more people willing to take out <a title="personal loans" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">personal loans</a> to buy a home, it isn&#8217;t all good news. Home sales over the past year, as opposed to just the past few months, are still dismal. November home sales for 2010 were actually a big drop. About 30 percent fewer homes sold in November 2010 than in November 2009. It&#8217;s harder to get a loan, and few people feel safe enough to buy. Home sales are on pace to record the lowest levels in sales since 1997. Applications for mortgage loan modification and new loans dropped in November, but that may be due to few people wanting to buy so close to the holidays.</p>
<h3>Not the greatest signs</h3>
<p>The real estate industry is still struggling to regain its footing, and the supply of available homes, more than nine months worth, is still more than it should be in a healthy market. However, as long as gains keep getting posted consistently, it will get there eventually.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2010-12-22-existing-home-sales_N.htm" rel="external nofollow">USA Today</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fewer people are under water on mortgage bank loans</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/16/underwater-bank-loans/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/16/underwater-bank-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get a loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installment loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwater mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=97072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fewer people are getting under water on the bank loans on their homes. Underwater is when a person ends up owing more to the mortgage company than the home is worth. However, part of it is thanks to the number of foreclosures. Fewer bank loans are getting underwater The number of people under water on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martin,_John_-_The_Deluge_-_1834.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Waves" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TQqlO9Vn3WI/AAAAAAAADJk/DIsQycLsGE4/s288/Waves.jpg" alt="Waves" width="288" height="192" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The number of people underwater on bank loans for homes they bought is declining, but not fast enough. Image from Wikimedia Commons. </p></div>
<p>Fewer people are getting under water on the bank loans on their homes. Underwater is when a person ends up owing more to the mortgage company than the home is worth. However, part of it is thanks to the number of foreclosures.</p>
<h2>Fewer bank loans are getting underwater</h2>
<p>The number of people under water on their homes &#8212; owing more in bank loans than the home is worth &#8212; is diminishing, according to USA Today. Underwater mortgages have become a problem for a lot of American homeowners, who went out to get a loan for a home, only for the value to plummet. Recreational and retirement hot spots like Nevada, Arizona and Florida were hit  hard, with greater numbers of foreclosures and real estate values dropping through the floor.In some urban areas, such as Chicago, the rate of foreclosures has&#8217;t been as bad as in other cities, especially in metro areas that are still heavy industrial centers.</p>
<h3>Foreclosures played a part</h3>
<p>The decline in underwater mortgages has been slight, only 0.5 percent. A large portion of the reduction in people paying <a title="installment loans" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">installment loans</a> for more than a home is worth is likely due to the sheer number of homes that have been foreclosed, taking numerous mortgages off the books. There have been some incentives offered from the government, but talking loan lenders into reducing debt when many a loan company  is struggling is a tough sell.</p>
<h3>Home values likely to stay down</h3>
<p>It is likely that the housing market is not going to be at its best for some time. Record number of foreclosures, and fewer people confident enough to purchase a home or able to qualify for the financing  due to tougher restrictions on credit, will work against the housing industry&#8217;s favor. However, growth has been slowly taking place, and a slower recovery than desired has appeared to be the most likely scenario.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2010-12-13-underwater-mortgages_N.htm" rel="external nofollow">USA Today</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hybrid vehicle tax rebate expiring</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/13/instant-money-hybrid-rebate/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/12/13/instant-money-hybrid-rebate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saving Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative motor vehicle credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevrolet volt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy act of 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get a personal loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid tax rebate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nissan leaf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=96528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Car buyers wanting to take advantage of instant money from the hybrid vehicle tax rebate had better act fast. The tax rebate on most hybrid cars and trucks, and on some diesels, is expiring in January 2011. Tax credits do remain for some plug-in vehicles, though. Tax rebate for green cars to expire In 2005, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2009_GMC_Yukon_Hybrid--DC.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="GMC Yukon Hybrid" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TQZzk1WLYFI/AAAAAAAADFE/IaHfBVsNOzI/s288/Yukon%20Hybrid.jpg" alt="GMC Yukon Hybrid" width="288" height="177" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">People looking for some instant money from the hybrid car tax rebate had better act fast, as the credit is expiring. Image from Wikimedia Commons. </p></div>
<p>Car buyers wanting to take advantage of instant money from the hybrid vehicle tax rebate had better act fast. The tax rebate on most hybrid cars and trucks, and on some diesels, is expiring in January 2011. Tax credits do remain for some plug-in vehicles, though.</p>
<h2>Tax rebate for green cars to expire</h2>
<p>In 2005, the government rolled out a new tax credit that promised instant money at tax time if a person purchased a hybrid car or certain diesel powered vehicles as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The Alternative Motor Vehicle Credit, for those who could or did take advantage of it, offered a great incentive to consult a loan company to finance a greener car. However, according to <strong>USA Today</strong>, that incentive is expiring. As of January 2011, there won&#8217;t be a break on the income tax bill for buying a hybrid car like the uber-popular Toyota Prius or eligible diesel models such as a Volkswagen Jetta TDI.</p>
<h3>Some rebates still available</h3>
<p>Though the bulk of the rebates are expiring, there are some that will still be available. Tax rebates will still be available for plug-in electric vehicles, such as the Chevrolet Volt and the Nissan Leaf. The hitch, though, is that to get those vehicles, a person has to get a <a title="personal loan" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">personal loan</a> for a lot more. The Leaf lists for $32,000 or more before any instant cash off the tax bill, and the Volt goes for about $40,000 before the rebate. The Prius, by contrast, goes for less than $25,000, although the Prius is no longer eligible for a rebate. Part of the bill was that once a car maker had sold 60,000 green vehicles, the rebate would no longer be available.</p>
<h3>Better act fast</h3>
<p>There are still some rebates available on some hybrid or diesel models, but only two weeks remain for the credit to be used. There is a list on <strong>USA Today</strong> and <strong>Consumer Reports</strong> of which vehicles are eligible for a rebate until Jan. 1, 2011.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/driveon/post/2010/12/federal-hybrid-diesel-tax-credits-run-out-at-end-of-month/1" rel="external nofollow">USA Today</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2010/12/hybrid-and-diesel-tax-credits-will-soon-expire.html" rel="external nofollow">Consumer Reports</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repossessions by mortgage loan lenders climb</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/09/16/repossessions-loan-lenders/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/09/16/repossessions-loan-lenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash advance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtytrac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repossession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=88886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dismal saga of the real estate industry in America continues, and despite the occasional bright spot, there is still plenty of bad news to go around. Sales were boosted for some time by the home buyer tax credit. Foreclosures were barely helped by the loan modification program from the government. Not only did few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 240px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_Senate_new_gavel.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Gavel" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TJKNTp2ZccI/AAAAAAAABGo/YLZZtEP6Ayg/s288/Gavel.jpg" alt="Gavel" width="230" height="288" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The auction gavel is due to fall on more homes, as repossessions are skyrocketing. Image from Wikimedia Commons.</p></div>
<p>The dismal saga of the real estate industry in America continues, and despite the occasional bright spot, there is still plenty of bad news to go around. Sales were boosted for some time by the home buyer tax credit. Foreclosures were barely helped by the loan modification program from the government. Not only did few homeowners actually have their bank loans and homes saved by the program, but repossessions have actually increased. In fact, repossessions increased by 25 percent since last year.</p>
<h2>Repossessions skyrocket</h2>
<p>The number of repossessions has shot through the roof since 2009. According to a recent report by RealtyTrac, repossessions are higher than have been recorded since the recession began. The number of repossessions in August 2010 was up to 95,364, according to <strong>Bloomberg.</strong> RealtyTrac has never recorded that large a number of repossessed homes in its existence. The number of repossessed homes, where a homeowner has to vacate the premises and the loan company tries to resell it, have only increased. Since August of 2009, repossessions increased 25 percent.</p>
<h3>Foreclosures decrease</h3>
<p>However, there is some good news. Overall foreclosure and default notices decreased by 5 percent since July of this year. That being said, there is a difference between foreclosures and repossessions. A foreclosure is when mortgage holders have fallen into default, and the bank begins a legal process to get them out of the homes. There also are ramifications, such as the mortgage holder being responsible for any lost revenue when the home sells. Repossessions are just when the bank or finance company kicks a delinquent homeowner out but doesn&#8217;t start any legal proceedings, and just resell the home.</p>
<h3>Foreclosure inventory increasing</h3>
<p>There is an incredible stockpile of available homes, some at discount prices. It isn&#8217;t as if you can buy a home with a small <a title="cash advance" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">cash advance</a>, but if you can get the financing, a good home can be acquired at a great price. As it stands today, one in every 381 homes in America has received a foreclosure notice.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-16/bank-seizures-of-u-s-homes-reach-record-for-the-third-time-in-five-months.html" rel="external nofollow">Bloomberg</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad bank loans to Fannie and Freddie not being bought back</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/09/15/bad-bank-loans/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/09/15/bad-bank-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad bank loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freddie mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guaranteed loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=88809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of what caused the collapse of the housing market was toxic mortgages. A loan lender or bank would lend a mortgage to a customer and sell the debt as an asset. Sometimes the mortgage went bad because of circumstances, and some were lent to people who shouldn&#8217;t have been lent bank loans in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MHV_Yugo_45A_01.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Yugo" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TJE6-MOaVNI/AAAAAAAABF0/Tg9Cs5u8fSc/s288/Yugo.jpg" alt="Yugo" width="288" height="196" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Selling bank loans as securities is not like selling used cars; if securities are defective, the seller must buy them back. Image from Wikimedia commons.</p></div>
<p>Part of what caused the collapse of the housing market was toxic mortgages. A loan lender or bank would lend a mortgage to a customer and sell the debt as an asset. Sometimes the mortgage went bad because of circumstances, and some were lent to people who shouldn&#8217;t have been lent bank loans in the first place. Many of these loans were sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and when the assets went bad, Fannie and Freddie went into freefall. Few of these bad loans are being bought back by the banks that sold them.</p>
<h2>Bad loans can be repurchased</h2>
<p>It seems fair that if bad mortgages were sold on the market and seriously damaging the companies that bought the bad finance loans, those loans should be bought back. In fact, laws were passed that guaranteed loans had to be bought back by the seller if the loans in question went bad. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae bought a lot of these mortgages. Because both of those companies are seriously in trouble, and the law is on their side, those toxic assets should be getting repurchased.</p>
<h3>No redress of defective assets</h3>
<p>However, the toxic assets are not being repurchased. In fact, according to <strong>USA Today</strong>, more than $11 billion in defective loans were returned by Fannie and Freddie to the institutions that sold them, only for the bank or loan company to refuse to purchase them. Of those defective loans, a third have been waiting to be addressed for at least 90 days. The backing for mortgage loans also was provided for by the Federal Housing Administration and the Veterans Administration.</p>
<h3>Banks hurting themselves</h3>
<p>A bank or loan company that refuses to buy back these loans is only hurting itself. Fannie and Freddie are being propped up with taxpayer dollars, and <a title="businesses" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">businesses</a> as well as individuals pay taxes. That means that the longer the mess drags on, the more everyone has to pay, including bank executives and shareholders.</p>
<h3>Sources</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2010-09-15-fannie-freddie_N.htm" rel="external nofollow">USA Today</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former GM financial wing Ally may have its own IPO</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/24/ally-ipo/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/24/ally-ipo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ally financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ally financial inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general motors financial acceptance corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm ipo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=87617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past few weeks, there has been a lot of buzz about an upcoming GM IPO. The related company, Ally Financial Inc., is now looking at an Initial Public Offering all its own next year. Ally Financial used to be GMAC, or General Motors Acceptance Corporation, the loan company formerly part of General Motors. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christmas_Decorations_on_Wall_Street.JPG" rel="external nofollow"><img title="NYSE on Wall Street" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/THQ4SuKbxwI/AAAAAAAAA6I/8YCDsOr2ms4/s288/Wall%20Street%20Xchange.JPG" alt="NYSE on Wall Street" width="288" height="216" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ally Financial Inc. may have an IPO just like former parent company General Motors. Image from Wikimedia Commons.</p></div>
<p>In the past few weeks, there has been a lot of buzz about an upcoming GM IPO. The related company, Ally Financial Inc., is now looking at an Initial Public Offering all its own next year. Ally Financial used to be GMAC, or General Motors Acceptance Corporation, the loan company formerly part of General Motors. GMAC used to deal only in auto loans, but branched out into other ventures including mortgages. GMAC had to ask for emergency loans from the TARP program, and had to become an actual bank to get bailout funding.</p>
<h2>Ally Financial starts posting profits</h2>
<p>Ally Financial Inc. is the re-branding of GMAC, or General Motors Acceptance Corporation. GMAC was previously the division of banking and loan lenders for General Motors. GMAC took care of in-house auto loans, but also delved into real estate and other ventures. In the second quarter of 2010, Ally posted a profit of $565 million, according to <strong>Reuters.</strong> First quarter saw a profit of $162 million; the first profit Ally or GMAC had posted since 2008. This was largely thanks to the company getting some debt settlement relief from mortgage holdings.The company may file for an IPO next year.</p>
<h3>Bank formerly known as GMAC</h3>
<p>Ally Financial Inc., is technically a holding company with many divisions. The company was previously known as GMAC, which was entirely owned by GM until 2006. GM needed a quick payday and sold its banking and finance wing to investors. GMAC needed some quick loans as its loan portfolio and <a title="investments" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">investments</a> went toxic and was bailed out by the government in exchange for taxpayers holding majority ownership. In 2009, the company changed the name to Ally Financial Inc.</p>
<h3>GM buys new auto financing company</h3>
<p>As Ally Financial is getting its act together, GM isn&#8217;t resting on its laurels. GM has just acquired a majority stake in auto loan company AmeriCredit, according to the <strong>Wall Street Journal.</strong> This may be a move toward allowing Ally to become its own entity, as GM retains only a small stake in ownership, so GM can have an in-house lender that doesn&#8217;t do anything else.</p>
<p><strong>Further Reading</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0314449820100803" rel="external nofollow">Reuters</a></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703506904575592282492534528.html?KEYWORDS=GM+Ally" rel="external nofollow">Wall Street Journal</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most get dropped from mortgage loan modification program</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/20/mortgage-modification-program/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/20/mortgage-modification-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home affordable modification program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make home affordable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage loan modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short term cash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=87435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the first things the Obama administration did once in office was to offer a mortgage loan modification program called Make Home Affordable, or the Make Home Affordable Modification Program. The way it worked is that the government would work with the loan company to make a borrower&#8217;s mortgage more affordable. People who did [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Letni_pod_vodou_%28underwater_summer_photo%29.jpg" rel="external nofollow"><img title="underwater" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_rw-8LvkNqYk/TG7yK9O2pfI/AAAAAAAAA4M/Ztph3rmH9HM/s288/Underwater.jpg" alt="underwater" width="288" height="168" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">More mortgages are going underwater, and the government&#39;s modification program isn&#39;t working. Image from Wikimedia commons.</p></div>
<p>One of the first things the Obama administration did once in office was to offer a mortgage loan modification program called Make Home Affordable, or the Make Home Affordable Modification Program. The way it worked is that the government would work with the loan company to make a borrower&#8217;s mortgage more affordable. People who did get the modification on their loans also may be more likely to default on their loans anyway. More people have been dropped than have stayed in the program.</p>
<h2>Tune in turn on drop out of mortgage mod</h2>
<p>There were 96,025 people dropped from the program for this month, according to <strong>CNN Money</strong>. The number of people that have been dropped so far is 616,389, and the number of successful modifications is 434,717. That&#8217;s a failure rate of about 60 percent. That means a person is more likely to not have a successful outcome if they do enroll in the program. Essentially, that means that enrolled homeowners are ensuring a few extra pay days for loan lenders, possibly at the expense of the taxpayers.</p>
<h2>Fewer people entering the program</h2>
<p>A homeowner must first go through three trial months before a permanent   modification can be made. According to the <strong>Wall Street Journal,</strong> there were 24,577 trial modifications granted for July, compared to 38,728 trial  modifications in June. For homeowners who successfully completed the trial phase, 37,000  permanent modifications were granted in July compared to 51,205 permanent  modifications in June. The  program either needs more <a title="short term" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">short term</a> cash or fewer people can apply or  need modification.</p>
<h3>Not exactly a home run</h3>
<p>There were also 12,912 people whose permanent modifications were canceled in July. But 272 had their permanent modification canceled because they paid off their mortgages. What this ultimately means is that the program has not been as successful as planned. This also means that if a person is thinking about entering into the program, they have around a 60 percent chance of failing if they get in.</p>
<p><strong>Further Reading</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703579804575441701960735166.html" rel="external nofollow">Wall Street Journal</a></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/08/20/news/economy/foreclosure_prevention_HAMP/" rel="external nofollow">CNN Money</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fluidnow is not so fluid; will the EUC Fix it?</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/09/fluidnow-euc-fix-unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/09/fluidnow-euc-fix-unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Tarlow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency unemployment benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euc fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluidnow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=86328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emergency unemployment benefits are a lifeline for hundreds of thousands of Americans who are suffering during the current recession and in need of emergency loans. Employers haven&#8217;t begun to hire as quickly as the government would have hoped, and hence extension of benefits has become a hot-button political issue. In Florida, the state&#8217;s Agency for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/labor2008/3562626867/" rel="external nofollow"><img title="unemployment_fluidnow" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_n2EFqVE4kos/TGAmd5Ww6hI/AAAAAAAAA7w/fHoIzUCMrMU/unemployment_fluidnow.jpg" alt="An unemployed construction worker holding a sign that reads &quot;The next pink slip might be yours.&quot;" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sobering news (Photo Credit: CC BY/aflcio/Flickr)</p></div>
<p>Emergency <a title="unemployment" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">unemployment</a> benefits are a lifeline for hundreds of thousands of Americans who are suffering during the current recession and in need of emergency loans. Employers haven&#8217;t begun to hire as quickly as the government would have hoped, and hence extension of benefits has become a hot-button political issue. In Florida, the state&#8217;s Agency for Workforce Innovation has made an earnest attempt to come to the aid of more than 100,000 &#8220;long-term&#8221; jobless through the website fluidnow (<a href="http://www.fluidnow.com/" rel="external nofollow">www.fluidnow.com</a>). Those unemployed persons whose claims had expired but were supposedly restarted due to an extension of benefits expected to be able to reinstate their benefits, but fluidnow has turned out to be <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/03/22/fluidnow-adds-insult-unemployment/">not so fluid</a> for some.</p>
<h2>Fluidnow unable to service customers in a timely manner</h2>
<p>According to one of Florida&#8217;s long-term unemployed, calling the fluidnow help line at 800-204-2418 results in hours of connection attempts, only to be greeted eventually be a pre-recorded &#8220;call back later&#8221; message. Eventually the intrepid citizen reached an AWI employee who had no information on whether they&#8217;d be eligible to receive an extension of unemployment benefits. The only reassurance Florida residents have received recently on this front came from AWI Director Cynthia Lorenzo, who claims that once the U.S. Department of Labor sent fluidnow guidance, payments would be issued. When that guidance would come – two weeks, as Lorenzo suggested, or some other interminable governmental interval – was uncertain.</p>
<h3>The EUC Fix – Hope for the hopeless</h3>
<p>Taking a loan from a loan company or signing up for a part-time job are among the only options open to many job seekers. However, these often won&#8217;t pay all the bills. Plus, there&#8217;s fear that the benefits already being received would shrink upon signing up for part-time work. Enter the Emergency Unemployment Compensation Fix. It was part of the most recent emergency unemployment benefits extension that made it out of Congress, reports Michigan&#8217;s MLive.com. The intention behind the provision is to &#8220;remove the disincentive for people who take part-time jobs while collecting benefits.&#8221; Struggling citizens would not have to fear having their benefits reduced in their second year of benefits, reports the Michigan news portal.</p>
<h3>EUC Fix is not retroactive</h3>
<p>According to the National Employment Law Project, the EUC Fix is only good for those unemployed citizens with benefit years ending on or after July 22, 2010. Those who don&#8217;t fit that window are out of luck, much like scores of Florida unemployed who are waiting on fluidnow or at least some form of instant loan. For more information on the EUC Fix, visit the <a title="National Employment Law Project" href="http://www.nelp.org/page/-/UI/2010/Final%20EUC%20Fix%20QA.pdf" rel="external nofollow">National Employment Law Project</a> website.</p>
<p><strong>Sources:</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-41045-Miami-Unemployment-Examiner%7Ey2010m7d27-Labor-Dept-yet-to-give-Florida-details-on-unemployment-extension" rel="external nofollow">Examiner.com</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.mlive.com/michigan-job-search/index.ssf/2010/08/latest_unemployment_extension_removes_di.html" rel="external nofollow">MLive.com</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Drug testing for unemployment in Florida</strong></p>
<p><object width="500" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RvSoZ1U3n30&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RvSoZ1U3n30&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="400" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Mexico Payday Loan</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/02/1121-new-mexico-payday-loan/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/08/02/1121-new-mexico-payday-loan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Detorreon Pla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[payday loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get cash today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico payday loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday lender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=85881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you need a payday loan, it isn&#8217;t that hard to get one in the state of New Mexico. Personal Money Market is in line with the state rules and guidelines of New Mexico. It doesn&#8217;t matter if you live in Roswell, Sante Fe or Silver City; a New Mexico payday loan is made and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p><img class="alignright" title="Get ahead with a New Mexico payday loan today!" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_ILA-VL6ldSQ/SzAK6aYf9pI/AAAAAAAACkE/cl-ffJihIag/7442258-533x800.png" alt="Woman with short hair facing a black-screen computer and thinking." width="300" height="245" />If you need a payday loan, it isn&#8217;t that hard to get one in the state of New Mexico. Personal Money Market is in line with the state rules and guidelines of New Mexico. It doesn&#8217;t matter if you live in Roswell, Sante Fe or Silver City; a New Mexico payday loan is made and designed for the citizens of your state.</p>
<h2>What are the requirements to get a New Mexico payday loan?</h2>
<ol>
<li>You need to be 18 years old or older to apply</li>
<li>Must be a legal U.S. citizen</li>
<li>Employed for the past three months and currently working</li>
<li>Have a valid social security number</li>
<li>Must be a legal U.S. resident</li>
</ol>
<h3>How can I contact the loan company for any questions?</h3>
<p>Go to the lender&#8217;s website and find their contact section. There you can find the agency&#8217;s number, mailing address and e-mail information. Use any of that information to contact the loan company directly.</p>
<h3>How much money can I get from the payday lender?</h3>
<p>The most money anyone can get for a short-term payday loan is $1,500, but in some cases, you can even get a <a title="personal loan" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">personal loan</a> of up to $2,500. The amount of money the average person gets is about $1,000. It is calculated by the individual loan agency using the information you submit on your application and the amount of money you make at your current job.</p>
<h3>Can I be in the military and still get this loan?</h3>
<p>Being in the military does not disqualify you from getting the loan; you have the same opportunity as a civilian does.</p>
<h3>Where can I get cash today?</h3>
<p>You can apply for a New Mexico payday loan here, right below this article. All you have to do is fill out the short application form that takes less than five minutes to fully complete.</p>
<h2>Start your New Mexico payday loan application HERE!</h2>
<div class="sc_content_app">
	<form action="https://personalmoneystore.com/application/" method="post" id="mca_d73">
		<fieldset class="content_app_fieldset">
			<div class="content_app_form">
				<div class="row"><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="FNamemca_d73">First name:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="FNamemca_d73" name="custfirstname" type="text" maxlength="32" value="" /></span></span><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="LNamemca_d73">Last name:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="LNamemca_d73" name="custlastname" type="text" maxlength="64" value="" /></span></span></div>
				<div class="row"><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="Phonemca_d73">Home Phone:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="Phonemca_d73" name="custhomephone" type="text" maxlength="32" value="" /></span></span><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="reqamountmca_d73">Requested Amount</label></span><span class="input"><select id="reqamountmca_d73" name="reqamount"><option value="" selected="selected">- Select -</option><option value="100">$100</option><option value="200">$200</option><option value="300">$300</option><option value="400">$400</option><option value="500">$500</option><option value="600">$600</option><option value="700">$700</option><option value="800">$800</option><option value="900">$900</option><option value="1000">$1000</option><option value="1100">$1100</option><option value="1200">$1200</option><option value="1300">$1300</option><option value="1400">$1400</option><option value="1500">$1500</option></select></span></span></div>
				<p class="agree_to_terms">By clicking apply now I agree with and have read the full <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/got-questions/payday-terms-of-use/" title="terms of use">terms of use</a>.</p>
				<a href="#" class="content_app_submit" onclick="document.getElementById('mca_d73').submit();" title="Submit">Submit</a>
			</div><input type="hidden" name="aff_id" id="mca_aff_id_mca_d73 " value="" /><input type="hidden" name="offer_id" id="mca_offer_id_mca_d73 " value="" /></fieldset>
	</form>
</div>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep your lights on with a payday loan</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/20/196-keep-your-lights-on-with-a-payday-loan/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/20/196-keep-your-lights-on-with-a-payday-loan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 19:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Bechtel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[payday loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash advance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disconnect notices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loan companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loan online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=75700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A payday loan can mean the difference between having your lights on and sitting in the dark. My energy company tends to send out disconnection notices if their customers are even two weeks late paying the bill. Even if the customer is caught up from prior months&#8217; bills, a notice is still sent. I received [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p><img class="alignright" title="Keep your lights on with a payday loan" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_irkkBd_n-do/S4bENCG4u4I/AAAAAAAAAaI/VVtq7LXGb2o/s400/78487003.jpg" alt="Apply for a payday loan to pay off that past-due energy bill." width="266" height="400" />A <a title="payday loan" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">payday loan</a> can mean the difference between having your lights on and sitting in the dark. My energy company tends to send out <strong>disconnection notices</strong> if their customers are even two weeks late paying the bill. Even if the customer is caught up from prior months&#8217; bills, a notice is still sent. I received such a notice just recently, and I may have to take out a payday loan in the future if this keeps happening. Have you ever faced a situation like this? Or maybe you are facing this situation right now. Could a payday loan help you keep your lights on?</p>
<h2>How much should I take out on a payday loan?</h2>
<p>How much you borrow from a payday loan company depends on how much you have to pay your energy company to keep your lights on. It could be as low as $100, or <strong>as much as $1,500</strong>. It just depends on how much you owe. A payday loan is meant to tide you over to your next payday, so choose the amount you take out carefully.</p>
<p>Decide on how much you can reasonably afford to pay back when your next paycheck arrives. If it falls short of how much money you need to pay off the total light bill, take out only what you can afford to pay back. Of course, you will need to talk with the energy company and work out a payment plan if this is the case. Do not take out what you cannot pay back quickly on your next payday.</p>
<h3>Applying is quick and painless</h3>
<p>With the many payday loan companies online today, the application process has become quick and painless. You can even apply for a <strong>payday loan online</strong>. In fact, for your convenience, there is a green &#8220;Apply&#8221; button right below this article you are reading. It is secure, so no worries about someone hacking your information. Just fill in the required details and you are on your way to keeping the lights on.</p>
<h3>Timely Repayments</h3>
<p>Once you get past the hurdle of paying your light bill, you need to remember to pay back the payday loan you took out. When that next paycheck arrives, you must pay back the loan. Besides, you would have had to pay this amount anyway on your next payday, so <strong>it&#8217;s best to pay on time</strong>. The added benefit of paying on time is that you avoid any late fees that are assessed if you do not pay on time. So keep that in mind when you take out the payday loan to keep the lights on.</p>
<h2>Start your payday loan application HERE!</h2>
<div class="sc_content_app">
	<form action="https://personalmoneystore.com/application/" method="post" id="mca_cc4">
		<fieldset class="content_app_fieldset">
			<div class="content_app_form">
				<div class="row"><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="FNamemca_cc4">First name:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="FNamemca_cc4" name="custfirstname" type="text" maxlength="32" value="" /></span></span><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="LNamemca_cc4">Last name:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="LNamemca_cc4" name="custlastname" type="text" maxlength="64" value="" /></span></span></div>
				<div class="row"><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="Phonemca_cc4">Home Phone:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="Phonemca_cc4" name="custhomephone" type="text" maxlength="32" value="" /></span></span><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="reqamountmca_cc4">Requested Amount</label></span><span class="input"><select id="reqamountmca_cc4" name="reqamount"><option value="" selected="selected">- Select -</option><option value="100">$100</option><option value="200">$200</option><option value="300">$300</option><option value="400">$400</option><option value="500">$500</option><option value="600">$600</option><option value="700">$700</option><option value="800">$800</option><option value="900">$900</option><option value="1000">$1000</option><option value="1100">$1100</option><option value="1200">$1200</option><option value="1300">$1300</option><option value="1400">$1400</option><option value="1500">$1500</option></select></span></span></div>
				<p class="agree_to_terms">By clicking apply now I agree with and have read the full <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/got-questions/payday-terms-of-use/" title="terms of use">terms of use</a>.</p>
				<a href="#" class="content_app_submit" onclick="document.getElementById('mca_cc4').submit();" title="Submit">Submit</a>
			</div><input type="hidden" name="aff_id" id="mca_aff_id_mca_cc4 " value="" /><input type="hidden" name="offer_id" id="mca_offer_id_mca_cc4 " value="" /></fieldset>
	</form>
</div>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get affordable payday installment loans today!</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/18/1121-affordable-payday-installment-loans/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/18/1121-affordable-payday-installment-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Detorreon Pla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[installment loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installment loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday installment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday installment loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday installment loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loan companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=75389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking for affordable payday installment loans? Don&#8217;t want to pay high interest for a payday installment loan that you plan on using short-term? Not all payday loan companies care about what you want as a loan client, but the people here at Personal Money Market are trained in matching up your situation with the right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p><img class="alignright" title="Get affordable payday installment loans today!" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_ILA-VL6ldSQ/S7o3SCQuoSI/AAAAAAAADKk/vWA6v8FTivo/86497506-300px.png" alt="Woman on the computer applying for payday installment loans." width="266" height="207" />Looking for affordable <a title="payday installment loans" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">payday installment loans</a>? Don&#8217;t want to pay high interest for a payday installment loan that you plan on using short-term? Not all payday loan companies care about what you want as a loan client, but the people here at <em><strong>Personal Money Market</strong></em> are trained in matching up your situation with the right loan agency. This will maximize your ability to get the most money, as well as link you with an agent who actually cares about your needs.</p>
<h2>Payday installment loans:<br />
How fast is the loan process?</h2>
<p>You should get a quick turnaround when you apply for payday installment loans. You will know within minutes of submitting your application whether you have been approved. If you&#8217;re approved, you will have cash sent to your personal account within 24 hours in most cases, sometimes in as little as two hours.</p>
<h3>How much money can I get?</h3>
<p>For most payday installment loans, you can <strong>get up to $1,500</strong> depending on how much money you make. If you would like to receive more than this, you will need to speak with an agent for possible consideration of this request.</p>
<h3>How will my payday installment payments be like?</h3>
<p>Your monthly installment payments will be based on the amount you borrowed as well as any personal request that is granted to you by the loan agency. One advantage of payday installment loans is, instead of having to repay the loan back in full on your next pay day, you can have your payments spread out over several pay periods. If the loan company says that you are to pay $50 a month based on how much you borrowed, you can request a different <strong>payment plan</strong> if you feel it is too much for you. You may be able to request a $40 payment for each month, with a slightly longer pay period.</p>
<h3>Where can I apply for a payday installment loan?</h3>
<p>You can apply right here, just below this article, for payday installment loans. The short application form will guide you throughout the entire process.</p>
<h2>Payday Installment Loans | Start HERE</h2>
<div class="sc_content_app">
	<form action="https://personalmoneystore.com/application/" method="post" id="mca_b05">
		<fieldset class="content_app_fieldset">
			<div class="content_app_form">
				<div class="row"><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="FNamemca_b05">First name:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="FNamemca_b05" name="custfirstname" type="text" maxlength="32" value="" /></span></span><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="LNamemca_b05">Last name:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="LNamemca_b05" name="custlastname" type="text" maxlength="64" value="" /></span></span></div>
				<div class="row"><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="Phonemca_b05">Home Phone:</label></span><span class="input"><input id="Phonemca_b05" name="custhomephone" type="text" maxlength="32" value="" /></span></span><span class="column3"><span class="label"><label for="reqamountmca_b05">Requested Amount</label></span><span class="input"><select id="reqamountmca_b05" name="reqamount"><option value="" selected="selected">- Select -</option><option value="100">$100</option><option value="200">$200</option><option value="300">$300</option><option value="400">$400</option><option value="500">$500</option><option value="600">$600</option><option value="700">$700</option><option value="800">$800</option><option value="900">$900</option><option value="1000">$1000</option><option value="1100">$1100</option><option value="1200">$1200</option><option value="1300">$1300</option><option value="1400">$1400</option><option value="1500">$1500</option></select></span></span></div>
				<p class="agree_to_terms">By clicking apply now I agree with and have read the full <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/got-questions/payday-terms-of-use/" title="terms of use">terms of use</a>.</p>
				<a href="#" class="content_app_submit" onclick="document.getElementById('mca_b05').submit();" title="Submit">Submit</a>
			</div><input type="hidden" name="aff_id" id="mca_aff_id_mca_b05 " value="" /><input type="hidden" name="offer_id" id="mca_offer_id_mca_b05 " value="" /></fieldset>
	</form>
</div>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac foreclosures cost tax payers billions</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/12/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-foreclosures/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/12/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-foreclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae and freddie mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freddie mac foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=74858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fannie Mae foreclosures are swamping the nation&#8217;s largest mortgage buyer. Fannie Mae reported an $11.5 billion loss in the first quarter of 2010. Fannie Mae stock has been in freefall. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae&#8217;s little brother, lost more than $6.7 billion. Monday, Fannie Mae asked the U.S. Treasury for an infusion of $8.4 billion. Together, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thetruthabout/3189812973/" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Home foreclosure" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3406/3189812973_77e29f6bcb.jpg" alt="An auction sign in the window of a house after foreclosure" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fannie Mae <a title="foreclosures" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">foreclosures</a> are fueling losses and costing the government billions, but Congress, afraid to make the housing market worse, is avoiding the issue. Flickr photo.</p></div>
<p>Fannie Mae foreclosures are swamping the nation&#8217;s largest mortgage buyer. Fannie Mae reported an $11.5 billion loss in the first quarter of 2010. <a title="Fannie Mae" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/05/10/fannie-mae/">Fannie Mae stock has been in freefall.</a> Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae&#8217;s little brother, lost more than $6.7 billion. Monday, Fannie Mae asked the U.S. Treasury for an infusion of $8.4 billion. Together, Fannie and Freddie say they need about $20 billion to stay afloat.</p>
<h2>Fannie and Freddie: the only game in town</h2>
<p>Politicians on both sides of the congressional aisle are eager to score points by threatening to quit giving money to Fannie and Freddie. The problem is that Fannie and Freddie are often the only loan company in town, since the market for mortgage securities froze up in 2008. Fannie Mae foreclosures are steadily increasing, so nobody in Congress has the guts right now to do anything that could further weaken the housing market.</p>
<h3>Fannie and Freddie: politics as usual</h3>
<p>Politicians have been avoiding action on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, even though the Senate passed an amendment Wednesday placing stricter rules on writing loans. <a title="Politico.com" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37144.html" rel="external nofollow">Politico reports</a> that  the Senate failed to pass a provision on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Tuesday night. Republicans and Democrats can&#8217;t agree about language dealing with loans and who should be responsible for overseeing regulations. Democrats want a newly created consumer protection agency to regulate the loans. Republicans whipped out the big government card, saying that the consumer protection agency would have too much power.</p>
<h3>Fannie and Freddie go deep</h3>
<p>Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac behaved like any other bank during the housing bubble. The greedy siblings collected $3.9 trillion from investors who bought bundles of mortgages they assembled. Fannie Mae stock soared, for awhile.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are publicly traded companies, but when they got in too deep, investors lost confidence. Fannie and Freddy threatened to collapse&#8211;bring down the nation&#8217;s housing market with them. To avert catastrophe, the federal government was forced to take over Fannie and Freddie in 2008.</p>
<h3>Fannie Mae stock</h3>
<p>To date, the U.S. Treasury has thrown more than $145 billion into the Fannie/Freddie rabbit hole. <a title="Medill Chicago" href="http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=164482" rel="external nofollow">Medill Chigago reports</a> that meanwhile Fannie Mae reported a quarterly loss of $11.53 billion, or $2.29 per diluted share of Fannie Mae stock, which is good news considering that losses were $23.2 billion and $4.09 a share the year before. Analysts had estimated a loss of $1.75 per share. Monday’s report marked the 11th consecutive quarterly loss.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, Fannie Mae’s shares traded at about $1.05. Two years ago, shares prices sat at  about $26.30. And, for much of the last decade, shares fluctuated  between $65 and $80. The stock closed down 0.94 percent at $1.05 on  Tuesday.</p>
<h3>Fannie and Freddie&#8217;s dilemma</h3>
<p>Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are hemorrhaging money because they own or guarantee more than 50 percent of mortgages in the U.S. The <a title="New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/business/09gret.html" rel="external nofollow">New York Times reports</a> that details about losses at Freddie Mac paint a scary picture of the current housing market. Freddie Mac foreclosures rose from 29,145 properties at the end of March 2009 to almost 54,000 units in 2010. Freddie’s nonperforming assets almost doubled, rising to $115 billion from $62 billion. Freddie Mac foreclosures lose about 39 percent on average when they sell.</p>
<h3>Freddie Mac delinquencies</h3>
<p>Freddie Mac is also plagued by delinquencies, according to the New York Times. Mortgage payments more than 90 days late in Freddie’s single-family conventional loan portfolio are 4.13 percent, up from 2.41 percent for the period a year earlier. Delinquencies in Freddie&#8217;s Alt-A book, one step up from subprime loans, totaled 12.84 percent. Delinquencies on interest-only mortgages were 18.5 percent. Delinquencies on option-adjustable rate loans totaled 19.8 percent.</p>
<h3>Fannie and Freddie: indefinite, infinite losses</h3>
<p>Fannie Mae was created during The Great Depression to make sure that sufficient funds were available to mortgage lenders, then rechartered by Congress in 1968 as a publicly traded company. Freddie was created for the same reason in 1970. Today, both companies are caught between a rock and a hard place. When the housing market tanked, Fannie and Freddie began losing billions. But the mortgage meltdown also made the nation&#8217;s housing market totally dependent on them. Fannie and Freddie exist to support the mortgage market by buying loans from banks and other lenders. At the same time, they must work to minimize credit losses so the billions that taxpayers have thrown at them don’t vaporize.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cape Wind project approved &#124; Arguments for and against</title>
		<link>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/04/28/cape-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/04/28/cape-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Rice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law and Order/Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science/Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cape cod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cape wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nantucket bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salazar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/?p=73572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cape Wind has been one of the most hotly debated renewable power projects in the country. Now that Cape Wind has been approved by the U.S. Department of the Interior, the debate is getting even more frantic. If Cape Wind is built, it will be the first-ever U.S. offshore wind development and would be able [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 385px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pjh/" rel="external nofollow"><img title="Offshore wind farm" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/76/185488383_b48a2c2dcf.jpg" alt="Offshore wind farm" width="375" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Cape Wind would be the first U.S. offshore wind farm. Image from Flickr.</p></div>
<p>Cape Wind has been one of the most hotly debated renewable power projects in the country. Now that Cape Wind has been approved by the U.S. Department of the Interior, the debate is getting even more frantic. If Cape Wind is built, it will be the first-ever U.S. offshore wind development and would be able to provide cheap power to three quarters of the Cape Cod community. Developers have a loan company and technology at the ready, but some residents of the shoreline are vowing to fight the development as long as they can.</p>
<h2>What is Cape Wind?</h2>
<p>Cape Wind is a planned 130-turbine wind farm in Nantucket Sound. The original proposal for Cape Wind was submitted almost a decade ago, and it has been under &#8220;federal review&#8221; for nine years. The offshore wind turbines would be anchored in the sea floor and would use the strong, constant sea wind to generate power. Visual simulations estimate that Cape Wind turbines would appear about one-half of one inch tall when standing on the shore. Cape Wind would be the first offshore wind farm in the United States, though there are proposals for Texas, Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey as well.</p>
<h3>Arguments against Cape Wind</h3>
<p>Cape Wind encountered its first roadblocks very early in the project development. Late Senator Edward Kennedy fought against Cape Wind, worried that it would be a &#8220;special interest giveaway&#8221; and that it would ruin the views from the family property that looks out onto Nantucket Bay. Other anti-Cape Wind groups worry that the wind farm would &#8220;jeopardize tourism&#8221; by changing the view of Nantucket Bay. The Wampanoag Native American tribe has also challenged Cape Wind. The Wampanoag tribe claims that Cape Wind would obstruct religious practice that requires a clear view of the sun over the bay &#8211; and that the windmills would be anchored in long-flooded burial grounds.</p>
<h3>Arguments for Cape Wind</h3>
<p>Proponents of the Cape Wind development form a coalition just as broad. Environmental groups have lauded Cape Wind, as the renewable energy from the development would provide clean energy for three quarters of Cape Cod. As domestically produced power, the Cape Wind project would also help reduce U.S. dependence on oil, a major goal of the Obama administration. Cape Wind would also provide hundreds of &#8220;green jobs&#8221; in the depressed <a title="economy" href="https://personalmoneynetwork.com">economy</a>.</p>
<h3>Government approves Cape Wind</h3>
<p>Though U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has approved Cape Wind, that is far from the last word on the development. While other countries, such as Denmark, have been using Cape Wind-style projects to provide power for years, this project would jump-start the U.S. development of clean offshore power. Opponents have vowed to use quick loans to fight Cape Wind in court at the same time environmental groups, and the government, are looking for domestic energy solutions that don&#8217;t risk <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/04/26/oil-spill-gulf-of-mexico/">1,800 square mile oil spills</a>. What is your opinion of Cape Wind?</p>
<h3>Sources:</h3>
<p>NPR.org at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126363616<br />
<a href="http://views.washingtonpost.com/climate-change/post-carbon/2010/04/salazar_to_approve_cape_wind.html" rel="external nofollow">Washington Post</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

