Ontario Payday Loan Restrictions Coming into Force

Thursday, November 15th, 2012 By

But Nanny State Leanings Make it All Ridiculous

It's all well and good when you're seven, but Ontario wants to nanny its payday loan customers so they don't have to be responsible. (Photo: flickr.com)

It's all well and good when you're a baby, but Ontario wants to nanny its payday loan customers so they don't have to be responsible. (Photo: flickr.com)

When it comes to short-term consumer lending, few products are as quick and convenient as a payday loan. The bulk of payday loan companies in Canada operate within the bounds of established governmental guidelines into order to provide consumers with a safe, affordable product while businesses collect profits that offset operating costs. Yet there are an unfortunate few who attempt to operate “beneath the radar,” charging overly inflated rates and enforcing abusive loan terms. Section 347 of the Canadian criminal code attempts to regulate this with a limit of 60 percent interest that can be charged per annum, but further intervention has been necessary in order to protect consumers.

The Payday Loans Act of 2008

Here’s a prime example of an attempt to make things right. In June of 2008, the Ontario Legislature devised the Payday Loans Act in order to require that all payday lenders and pawnbrokers:

  • Become licensed
  • Clearly spell out all costs of borrowing
  • Prohibit loan rollover by instituting a database
  • Allow borrowers to cancel their payday loan contract during an initial cooling-off period (within the first two days)

Furthermore, the Payday Loans Act was to make it easier for offending payday loan companies to have their licenses suspended and establish the Ontario Payday Lending Education Fund to promote consumer understanding of and confidence in the product.

Capping the Numbers

By the time additional provisions were in place by April 1, 2009, the Payday Loan Act was also altered by Ontario’s Maximum Total Cost of Borrowing Advisory Board so the most money that could be charged per $100 borrowed is $21. For a standard two-week payday loan, that’s 21 percent, which is not out of the realm of feasibility.

However, there was little or no penalty in place for consumers who defaulted on their loans. It seems unconscionable for there not to be consequences when a consumer makes a promise to repay a debt and doesn’t follow through. Such a lack of safeguarding damages payday lenders severely, just as it would any business that exposed itself to financial risk but didn’t have the tools to protect itself in the event of default. This is definitely an example of the nanny state at work, absolving others of taking responsibility for themselves.

Now Ontario has an Order Dealing with “Criminal Interest Rates”

Specifically, “Order Designating Ontario for the Purposes of the Criminal Interest Rate Provisions of the Criminal Code P.C. 2009-1628 October 1, 2009” has taken a big step toward expunging out-of-control interest rates. Payday loan companies that fail to toe the line will no longer be able to escape notice. This is an order “DESIGNATING ONTARIO FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE CRIMINAL INTEREST RATE PROVISIONS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.” It appears in large, capital letters because Ontario wants it known that from this point forward, all payday loan stores in the province are required by section 347.1 of the Criminal Code. Once the following two provisions are in effect:

  1. The Payday Loans Act, 2008, S.O. 2008, c. 9, except for sections 52 and 66 to 74; and
  2. Ontario Regulation 98/09, except for sections 37 and 38.

The $21 per $100 loaned will definitely be in effect, without exemption. But what will happen to the lack of protection afforded payday loan companies for customers who don’t pay? What does Nanny Ontario plan to do about that? This isn’t a game of jacks among five-year-olds; these are adults who should have learned to take responsibility for their actions a decade or more before. It would be in the best interests of its citizens if Ontario (and Canada as a whole) reconsidered this ridiculous lack of penalty for default.

Related Video:

Previous Article

« Miss the President’s Speech Last Night? Watch it Here

The President's speech last night outlined his health care reform plan and addressed controversies and misunderstandings that have surrounded it.. Image from Flikr.com.
Next Article

SUNY enacts greater protection for students against credit cards »

SUNY has just changed the rules about how credit card companies can market on campuses. There is rising concern about debt among students. Black Hole Quasar

Leave a Reply

Other recent posts by Steve Tarlow

Making a personal budget: Know the ins and outs

Making and sticking to a budget requires some discipline, but once setting aside money becomes a habit, you'll have a brighter financial future.
A piggy bank graphic depicting all the areas consumers should consider when it comes to making a personal budget.

Credit Card Minimum Payments are Hypnotic Conditioning

Credit card companies love it when you only make the minimum payment. That small number is a kind of hypnotic conditioning, says Stewart.
"Your eyes feel so very heavy. You will pay only the minimum balance on your credit card…"