The California Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act: Part 1

Tuesday, April 8th, 2014 By

A single joint of marijuana

If passed, the California act would legalize and tax recreational marijuana. Image from Flickr.

Yesterday evening, the California Secretary of State confirmed that the voter initiative to legalize marijuana received an estimated 523,531 valid signatures – well more than the 433,971 signatures needed to get on the November ballot. The California legalization initiative has supporters that argue pot legalization will not only save the cash-strapped California economy money, but will bring in the instant cash of tax revenue. Some detractors of the bill argue that legalizing the drug will lead to an increase in crime and health impacts. Other detractors worry that legalizing gray-market marijuana will decrease the quality of marijuana and significantly harm the budding marijuana industry. Part 1 of this article covers the Regulate, Control, and Tax Cannabis Act in California and the arguments for its passage. Part 2: Arguments against Marijuana Legalization in California covers the arguments against marijuana legalization in California.

History of marijuana legalization in California

In 1913, the first state law criminalizing marijuana in the United States was passed in California. Other states quickly followed suit. By 1937, federal law made possession or transfer of “Marihuana” illegal for everything except medical and industrial uses.

This act was declared unconstitutional in 1969, but the U.S. Federal government included marijuana in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. In 1996, California legalized medical marijuana with Proposition 215, reigniting a national debate. On the federal level, marijuana remains an illegal Schedule I narcotic considered to have “no valid medical use.”

The California marijuana legalization measure

The California voter initiative to legalize pot, known as the Regulate, Control, and Tax Cannabis Act lays out several limitations on the legal use of marijuana. The initiative would allow anyone 21 or older to “possess, cultivate or transport marijuana for personal use.” Local governments throughout California would have the ability to tax and regulate commercial production or sale of marijuana. Individuals would also be prohibited from smoking marijuana in public, smoking marijuana while minors are present, providing to any underage person, possessing the drug on school grounds or driving while under the influence of marijuana.

The cost-savings argument for marijuana legalization

Supporters of the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act argue that the legalization of marijuana would save the State of California a significant amount of money. California is currently in a huge budget deficit, and has been using payday cash advances on the state budget to cover costs.

Estimates for these savings range from $156 million to $1 billion. Supporters claim that once the already-stretched-thin law-enforcement system stops prosecuting individuals for growing, possessing or selling marijuana they can focus on crimes and criminals that are more violent or dangerous. Proponents also point out that while very few deaths in California can be attributed to marijuana, alcohol contributes to hundreds of deaths each year.

The taxation argument for cannabis legalization

In addition to saving the state of California millions of dollars in law enforcement, the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act also gives local governments the ability to tax marijuana. Proponents of the act estimate that $15 billion worth of gray-market and black market marijuana is sold each year in California.

An excise tax on the retail sales of marijuana would bring in an estimated $1.3 billion a year or more in revenue. Some counties and cities within California currently tax medical marijuana dispensaries. These city and county taxes bring in as much as $350,000 per dispensary.

The jobs argument for legalizing pot

Some areas of California, such as Humboldt County, already have a thriving marijuana tourism industry. With services from medical marijuana dispensaries to schools focused on how to grow marijuana, the area brings in several million dollars a year in tourism revenue. Supporters of legalizing cannabis point out that if the marijuana tourism industry in California grows to just one-third the size of the wine industry, it would create more than 50,000 jobs. If marijuana were legalized, it would also become legal to produce hemp in the state, which could add to the agricultural base of California.

California’s Regulate, Control, and Tax Cannabis Act is due to go on the November ballot. To see the arguments against the legalization of marijuana in California, see Part 2: Arguments against Marijuana Legalization in California.

Sources:

Business Week
Seattle Times
Time Magazine
CNN
California NORML

Previous Article

« CARD Act could strip stay-at-home partners of financial identity

The consumer-protection CARD Act is supposed to protect consumers, but some stay-at-home spouses hit snags because they can't prove income. Credit Card Applications
Next Article

Childhood cartoons on Facebook | Child abuse needs more than this »

Facebook users are changing their profile pictures to childhood cartoons to "fight child abuse," but more action is needed for real change. Cartoons from the '80s

This post has 4 comments

  1. Rox Berry says:

    The bill will allow commercial growers into the arena, that means RJ Reynolds and every corn, wheat and soy grower in California will switch from growing food to growing pot. This bill is designed to cut out the small farmer from the picture. Powerful lobbyists will persuade cities to charge large fees to cultivate. Clearly this bill was written by a lawyer working for a collective that has lost it's business to better quality dispensaries. This will limit competition, increase the price and limit the supply so that these rich folks can get even richer and those who were just trying to provide quality pot will be forced back into the dangerous underground market. This is not legalization, this is a favor for a few. I hope prop 215 will truly prevail allow growers to continue to grow as much as needed for themselves and those who they care for. These laws are now being written by those who made the most money ripping people off for low quality pot because of little or no competition. This is America. Let's protect the market place and remove all limits. No limits on how much alcohol I can own or how much alcohol a wine maker can produce so why limits on pot? Favors!!! More pot growers means lower prices!

  2. sunshine says:

    Why cant they just say yes?? Look how much they stand to gain by doing it, this country is in the hole now, how much more can it stand, we are no longer the superpower, we just a bunch of broke ass people living on a big chunk of land.

  3. PartyDude420 says:

    Man.. that’s like really trippy stuff, you know? Cool..

    • LadyLawyer2474 says:

      I think it is magnificent that such badly formed policy as that surrounding marijuana prohibition is finally going to be under review. May this bill pass, so that the persecution of peace loving smokers can end.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

    Leave a Reply

    Other recent posts by bryanh

    Put an End to the Worry with No Credit Check Payday Loans

    When you are low on cash it may seem that there is nowhere to turn. No credit check payday loans are available through reputable sites to get you through.

    Keep Your Balance with a Payday Loan

    I’m short of cash until payday and I’ve got a real balancing act going on. I don’t have time to work on a household budget spreadsheet. I need cash today...

    Ways to Find Quick Cash by Cutting Back on Gas Costs

    Finding quick cash in today's economy has to be targeted towards scrutinizing monthly bills, like gas costs.