Who wants a rotten ACORN?
I am certainly not the only one concerned over ACORN and its role in razing America’s economy to the ground. Michael Gaynor writes that Anita MonCrief, who has testified in court against the community organization group, is eager to expose the group’s connection to Herbert Sandler. She’s writing a four-part series entitled “ACORN and the Sandlers.” Like everyone else who cares about eliminating government corruption, I’d love to see what she comes up with.
Why didn’t ACORN go after “one of the worst predatory lenders in the country?” What is its relationship with the Center For Responsible Lending (take a look; new information is always good, however)? What should we know about ACORN’s housing projects like Desert Rose in Arizona and the Glenn Subdivision in Texas? I look forward to Ms. MonCrief’s analysis.
President Obama’s connection
There are many people who are up in arms over Barack Obama ascending to the presidency when it is considered that he may have been closely involved with ACORN. You did know that ACORN has been accused of voter fraud by MonCrief and others, right?
ACORN is known to have had allies among Congressional Democrats. Senator Obama of Illinois was allegedly one of those. Where were they when ACORN was extorting banks into making bad loans and preventing the Treasury Department from overseeing what was going on with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? President George W. Bush, Senator John McCain and other Congressional Republicans were crying for that oversight to occur. Instead, the giant lenders melted down and the volcano that is the American economy blew its top.
Getting their cut
MonCrief continues to probe at ACORN:
Their latest endeavor illustrates that ACORN may not have its fingers around Obama’s throat quite as tightly as they would like. So, why not do a little street theater, it’s always worked before. They will cower him into submission the way they have everyone else with few exceptions. Secondly, like most of its campaigns, there can be no bailout for the homeowners without the “ACORN off the top cut.” America’s taxpayers are now part of one of the biggest schemes in the country, our money is being used to position ACORN for the 2010 and 2012 elections. As evidence has shown, Washington needs less ACORN cronies, not more.
Gaynor wonders what hold ACORN may have on President Obama. The president claims he represented them in a lawsuit involving a motor voter law where the Clinton Administration Justice Department sided with ACORN. Yet Gaynor cries foul against what he considers “liberal media” distortion of the facts. He accuses the New York Times of unfairly targeting conservative Republicans like John McCain (well, relatively conservative, in a liberal kind of way). Most importantly, Gaynor insists that the newspaper failed to report accurately about ACORN due to its liberal Democratic bias.
America should know the truth about ACORN and Obama, or at least more than a token comment by country’s Orator-in-Chief. Perhaps MonCrief has access to untold information. Or perhaps it will just be another version of that great subjective notion of truth that exists in the Information Age.
And that’s only from Part I of MonCrief’s series!
In Part II, she digs deeper for gold:
While Obama is touting a $65 a month increase for America’s workers, ACORN is priming the pump for federal “black gold.” ACORN appears to be challenging Obama for their piece of the pie, either through the stimulus or the foreclosure package. Either way it is now up to the Administration to stand up to a bunch of thugs who are currently under criminal investigation in almost 15 states.
Gaynor asks an obvious question. If President Obama is truly “in the pocket” with easy loans from ACORN, will he actually stand up to them and make current criminal prosecution count? In that scenario, it would appear that the answer would be a resounding “no.” In light of the near trillion-dollar stimulus spending bill – which Gaynor likes to point out was called “pork-free” by the current administration – what is truly being done? Is ACORN being put in its place or rewarded? More on this as information becomes available…
Related Videos:
Few, if any reporters have provided the kind of indepth reporting on ACORN that Ms. Moncrief has been able too. I think someone should follow the connection between the election board in Washington DC, and the Center For Responsible Lending. A little digging will provide a direct link.
Alright, I’m up for a little “reform now” – and first is rescinding ACORN’s tax exempt status as a non profit, if they have it. Second, is to have the people who committed voter fraud up on charges of treason, because messing with the legitimacy of the voting system is tantamount to it.