ucan.org | Fake Consumer Advocacy Website?

By David Johnston, your payday loan news source

UCAN.ORG - So called: “Utility Consumers’ Action Network”

Don’t be fooled by their past pseudo accomplishments. It seems UCAN is not for the people anymore and may never have been. Actually, UCAN appears to support the oppression of the people in its own quest for power. UCAN seems to support denying the people the basic right to freedom of financial choice. They look to be specifically against women’s rights when it comes to short term lending options. UCAN’s thirst for internet power has turned it into something truly ugly and negative. Setting women’s rights back to 40 years ago will not make consumers safer. Wake up and leave the bigoted age behind finally.

It seems that if it was up to UCAN, all freedom of choice would be demolished in the name of consumer advocacy. UCAN claims to be supporters of what is best for the people but if you read all the hatefully ignorant garbage on their site it becomes apparently obvious that they look like a self serving hoard of hate mongers. They have found a way to make money, under the guess of being a non profit organization, by targeting all commercial enterprises like blood sucking lawyer leaches sometimes do.

They feed off of the negativity and hate of the people, taking advantage of the economic hard times. Anger is their fuel and their downfall as they blindly wield their sword by writing slanderous articles about any commercial website that crosses their path. They devise their articles to leach upon the name of their victims in a very sneaky way. They manipulate search engine results so their articles appear just under their victims listings in Yahoo, Google, and MSN. That way they wrongly gain the appearance of an authentic neutral reviewer of the site.

By their own admission they show a threatening manner and intent to take action to damage sites they feel are the enemy. The excerpt below was posted in response to a comment left on the ucan.org site with the purpose of fighting for personal freedom of financial choice. They saw blood when they realized the post was not from one of their cohort hate mongers. This is what they had to say:

“UCAN has a very open policy on blogging. We want to hear your opinions, but if you engage in blogging for advertising, you may learn to regret it.”

UCAN purposely attempts to ruin the reputation of commercial websites. They claim to be non profit but that does not mean they aren’t getting money in their personal pockets through their hateful and deceitful tactics.

We urge readers to say YES to freedom of financial choice and NO to hater monger advocacy.

Company Info for ucan.org:
UCAN | Utility Consumers’ Action Network – non-profit, public interest consumer advocacy
Michael Shames
3100 Fifth Ave. #B
San Diego, CA
92103
US
Phone: +1 619 696 6966
mshames@ucan.org

Watch this video to see how they are insensitive toward women during the fragile time of giving birth. This shows how low they go to get their hate message out on the world wide web under the fake facade of being a consumer watch dog.

Please Subscribe Through Feedburner or Google

Subscribe Through Google Without Email
Previous Article

« Almighty Oprah and Installment Loans Give Your Budget a Boost

Get advice on how to save A LOT of money and learn how short term installment loans can help your budget. Saving money is essential
Next Article

Payday Loans Fight The Opposition For Consumer Freedom »

Are payday loans predatory or is that what you the opposition against the industry wants you to think? READ MORE... Payday loans are predatory?  That's what the opposition would like you to think.
Personal Money Store

Discussion of ucan.org | Fake Consumer Advocacy Website?

This post has one comment

  1. The bulk of the above video is completely unnecessary. The point is at the end, and it has no real connection to the pointless drivel seen beforehand. I see where UCAN was attempting humor, but they failed miserably.

    Out of curiosity, I checked out UCAN’s site. There are useful pieces mixed in amidst hollow hit pieces. Perhaps it depends upon the author. However, I found Mr. Langley’s piece that appears to have spurred this post to be insulting to the intelligence of readers.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

Leave a Reply